Comments on: The Favourites Phenomenon Review http://www.horseracingman.com/the-favourites-phenomenon-review/ we test horse racing systems. Review of horseracing systems. Mon, 06 Sep 2010 16:47:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Robert http://www.horseracingman.com/the-favourites-phenomenon-review/comment-page-1/#comment-6091 Robert Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:45:05 +0000 http://www.horseracingman.com/?p=55#comment-6091 I have had an email from Bisogno on his latest venture thie one is amongst it. I cant help but wonder why he promotes such stuff he must be getting paid to do so E G Betalay sold by the Rochdale crew he gives 10 out of 10 so the rest of his crap cant be any safer and I told him so. Try this one out Admin go to bettingprofitsofware.com results are second to non. Yours Robert I have had an email from Bisogno on his latest
venture thie one is amongst it. I cant help but wonder why he promotes such stuff he must be getting paid to do so E G Betalay sold by the Rochdale crew he gives 10 out of 10 so the rest of his crap cant be any safer and I told him so.
Try this one out Admin go to bettingprofitsofware.com results are second to non.
Yours Robert

]]> By: admin http://www.horseracingman.com/the-favourites-phenomenon-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5972 admin Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:24:06 +0000 http://www.horseracingman.com/?p=55#comment-5972 John=> You have a stop loss on this system plus more features to make sure you don't loss your entire bankroll. Maximum is 30 units (as we tested the system, could be it is changed now). Why don't you take the time to test the results?? We would never recommend a pure martingale system!! John=> You have a stop loss on this system plus more features to make sure you don’t loss your entire bankroll. Maximum is 30 units (as we tested the system, could be it is changed now).
Why don’t you take the time to test the results??

We would never recommend a pure martingale system!!

]]> By: John http://www.horseracingman.com/the-favourites-phenomenon-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5971 John Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:17:45 +0000 http://www.horseracingman.com/?p=55#comment-5971 This is nothing more than a rehashing of the suidical Martingale System under which you simply increase stakes after every loser until you get a winner. On paper it cannot fail but in practice only a complete idiot would try it. The very fact that you bothered to trial this syetm shows you are either a fucking idiot or am affiliate thief. This is nothing more than a rehashing of the suidical Martingale System under which you simply increase stakes after every loser until you get a winner.

On paper it cannot fail but in practice only a complete idiot would try it.

The very fact that you bothered to trial this syetm shows you are either a fucking idiot or am affiliate thief.

]]> By: Joe Sixpack http://www.horseracingman.com/the-favourites-phenomenon-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5919 Joe Sixpack Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:07:27 +0000 http://www.horseracingman.com/?p=55#comment-5919 Have been away from this site for a while, but i want to add something: As far as increasing stakes is concerned: As long as the selection method has a level stakes Edge (Odds bigger or lower than they should be) it actually doesnt matter how much you stake. (Martingale is still a bad idea due to deviation and blood pressure issues :) ). Problem with most systems is that they have no real Edge to begin with ! Then staking methods are used to make results look promising / good. And after a while it fiddles out to zero or a small / big loss. On a personal note: There are only very few reasons to make a winning method public (by selling a system for example)... it just makes no sense most of the time (maybe if you need a decent starting bank and in case you are a poor fuck :) it would make sense to sell 10 or 20 copys at a price MUCH MUCH Higher than the average 47 Pounds E Book. Cheers Have been away from this site for a while, but i want to add something:

As far as increasing stakes is concerned:

As long as the selection method has a level stakes Edge (Odds bigger or lower than they should be) it actually doesnt matter how much you stake. (Martingale is still a bad idea due to deviation and blood pressure issues :) ).

Problem with most systems is that they have no real Edge to begin with ! Then staking methods are used to make results look promising / good.

And after a while it fiddles out to zero or a small / big loss.

On a personal note: There are only very few reasons to make a winning method public (by selling a system for example)… it just makes no sense most of the time (maybe if you need a decent starting bank and in case you are a poor fuck :) it would make sense to sell 10 or 20 copys at a price MUCH MUCH Higher than the average 47 Pounds E Book.

Cheers

]]> By: Chris http://www.horseracingman.com/the-favourites-phenomenon-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5652 Chris Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:35:24 +0000 http://www.horseracingman.com/?p=55#comment-5652 Does anyone know if you can use BetbotPRO to automate the FP syatem? Does anyone know if you can use BetbotPRO to automate the FP syatem?

]]> By: Phil http://www.horseracingman.com/the-favourites-phenomenon-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5551 Phil Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:47:09 +0000 http://www.horseracingman.com/?p=55#comment-5551 In the long term, this system can only LOSE you money - and lots of it. Anyone with an understanding of probability theory and betting knows that increasing stakes after a loser must - repeat MUST - lead to failure. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow but that run of losers is coming and when it arrives it will cost you everything you've ever won and more besides. In the long term, this system can only LOSE you money – and lots of it.

Anyone with an understanding of probability theory and betting knows that increasing stakes after a loser must – repeat MUST – lead to failure.

Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow but that run of losers is coming and when it arrives it will cost you everything you’ve ever won and more besides.

]]> By: xbs http://www.horseracingman.com/the-favourites-phenomenon-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4703 xbs Sun, 15 Mar 2009 03:11:33 +0000 http://www.horseracingman.com/?p=55#comment-4703 Looks like a winning one. Same question as Steve Knight asked right before me. Has anyone tried this strategy in a long term? Looks like a winning one. Same question as Steve Knight asked right before me. Has anyone tried this strategy in a long term?

]]> By: steve knight http://www.horseracingman.com/the-favourites-phenomenon-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4484 steve knight Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:07:22 +0000 http://www.horseracingman.com/?p=55#comment-4484 I'm thinking of joining this site. How is it currently doing? Is it doing as well as the reviews back in June 08? I’m thinking of joining this site. How is it currently doing? Is it doing as well as the reviews back in June 08?

]]> By: Jon http://www.horseracingman.com/the-favourites-phenomenon-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3419 Jon Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:53:33 +0000 http://www.horseracingman.com/?p=55#comment-3419 Candy You can get a bot for FP at www.betgear.net Jon Candy

You can get a bot for FP at http://www.betgear.net

Jon

]]> By: Candy http://www.horseracingman.com/the-favourites-phenomenon-review/comment-page-1/#comment-3410 Candy Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:17:13 +0000 http://www.horseracingman.com/?p=55#comment-3410 I am thinking of using this system alongside The Golden Key - would it be easy to do both ? I am lucky enough to be free in the afternoons. Any updates on The Bot for this system ? Thanks I am thinking of using this system alongside The Golden Key – would it be easy to do both ? I am lucky enough to be free in the afternoons.

Any updates on The Bot for this system ?
Thanks

]]>